What’s New June 7, 2013

The University of Michigan Department of Urology

3875 Taubman Center, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, SPC 5330, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-5330

Academic Office:  (734) 232-4943   FAX: (734) 936-8037   www.urology.med.umich.edu    https://matulathoughts.org/

 

What’s New June 7, 2013

 

A monthly communication to the faculty, residents, staff, and friends of the University of Michigan Urology Family.

 

 29 Items 15 minutes

 

1. Cabot Books

Michigan Urology is approaching its century mark, that is if you count back to when Hugh Cabot came to Ann Arbor in 1919.  By that point in time Genitourinary Surgery, well established as a distinct practice specialty, was being called Urology. In fact Cabot’s landmark 2-volume textbook in 1918, one of the first and best modern encyclopedias of our field, was called simply “Urology” instead of the older terminology.  (The other 2 “leaders and best” in my opinion were the Guiteras text in 1912 and the Young text in 1926.) After his return to Boston following service in WWI Cabot became disillusioned by the mercenary nature of his medical practice and imagined that a better career and life were possible. So he made a radical change of career and came to Michigan for the fulltime position (that is without a private practice) as Chair of Surgery.  He was such a catch that the regents gave him the University President’s House to live in until he got settled. Cabot’s talents quickly propelled him to appointment as the Dean of the Medical School.  He was the main force behind a revolutionary new University Hospital (1926-1986) and he built up a world-class faculty around great clinicians who changed their fields.

2. Cabot began to train urologists in Ann Arbor in 1926 when he brought Reed Nesbit from California and Charles Huggins from Boston here as his first trainees. The duo was an amazing first “residency” class. Nesbit innovated a modern approach to prostate surgery, trained a legion of leaders in our field, and rose to the heights of urology and surgery. When the U.S. Department of State needed the best of the best in urology to operate overseas on the head of a nation, they selected Nesbit.  Huggins was no minor league player either – he won the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 1966 for his work on the hormonal basis of prostate cancer.

3. Cabot and his contemporaries ushered in a new paradigm of genitourinary surgery, or “urology” to use the more modern term, as the old era of the “clap doctor” and venereology passed into the archives of history.  Nowadays we might call this process creative destruction. The new scientific ideas and technology provided better understanding of disease processes and better therapeutic solutions. Oddly, although our Department of Surgery has a Hugh Cabot Professorship, we still lack a Cabot professorship in the Department of Urology.  That may be a retirement project for me, but first we need to install the Ed McGuire Professorship in Urology this summer for Gary Faerber. I am very grateful to those who helped fund this. Every nickel and dime helped. Then we will set about working on a Jim Montie Professorship and even after that we have a long way to go in terms of our goal of providing named professorships for all of our professors and associate professors.

4. Endowed professorships immortalize the rich history of Michigan Urology and each one lays a marker for the future with the story of an individual.  By creating a modest but enduring funding offset for teaching, research, and leadership, these faculty create and maintain the Michigan Difference. The world economy, increasing regulation and industrial pressures are trying to “commoditize” our professional work. Universities additionally exert a heavy and increasing burden on their academic medical centers. At Michigan we have been successful in bringing some of the best and brightest medical students and residents into urology, and we have been successful at recruiting and retaining world class faculty here at Michigan. Keeping our game up will be tougher now that we have entered a new world order of health care organization and health care economics. The future is contingent on the Michigan philanthropic factor.

5. Hall1hall2

The Department of Urology front office hallway is a small gallery of Michigan Urology, but it is incomplete, starting at the beginning since we lack a portrait of Cabot in addition to pictures of many of our other nationally visible graduates. In fact, all of our graduates are important in that they have propelled Urology forward and delivered great care to hundreds of thousands of patients for nearly 90 years. The pictures on the wall represent many of our graduates who became academic leaders, although the collection is unfinished with many more pictures to collect, frame, and place. The story of Michigan Urology is a great work in progress, but it needs updating and retelling now more than a decade since Jim Montie commissioned John Konnak and Dev Pardanani to produce the first edition of our history.  This will be one of my next projects working along with Jim and Ed McGuire. A great part of the Michigan story is embedded in our endowed professorships with the names of faculty and alumni and friends of the department who have created a strong base for our success as leaders and best in training the next generation of great urologists and discovery that impacts urological disease and disability. The possibility for our continued and expanded success is contingent on the stewardship and growth of that base.

6. The AUA annual meeting in San Diego featured Michigan’s leaders and best at their best.  Ed McGuire was honored as one of the Four Founders of his field at the SUFU Research Foundation Dinner and Quentin Clemens gave him an excellent introduction.  Most of Ed’s fellows came from around the world to honor him – Australia, Ireland, Taiwan, among other places. David Miller organized the first Michigan Urological Surgical Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) annual meeting which had an excellent turn out.  Michigan was highly visible, with our students, residents, nurses, fellows, and faculty providing around 100 podium and poster presentations in addition to dozens of committee meeting participations.  We had a very fine turn out as well for the Reed Nesbit Reception at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association in San Diego. Somewhere around 130 attendees set a new record for us.

7.  What is the purpose of professional meetings such as ours? Some skeptics view them as boondoggles and carefree junkets. Perhaps this is the case in some fields, but this is hardly true in ours. In medicine, and urology in particular, professional meetings are the marketplace for ideas and talent. New ideas, presented by new faces along with established authorities, are heard and debated. The meetings glue together the participants of a profession and challenge them with novel ideas. Friendships are refreshed, new connections made, and anxieties are raised as younger presenters step up to podiums. Overall, these meetings are more enjoyment than stress and that’s a very good thing. It takes no major stretch of imagination to recognize that, as fun leads to serotonin release in the right places, raised consciousness often triggers new ideas that propel a field further ahead.

8.  Professional organizations create standards for their members and context for meetings. Journals take transient ideas from those meetings and publish them for durable inspection. (We hope the electronic publications are equally durable to paper.) As new hypotheses and techniques are refined in print and inspected globally, challenges and alternatives develop that in turn will enter the marketplace of ideas at meetings the next year. The myriad possibilities of the future is contingent on this virtuous cycle. Academic medicine is the primary engine for incubating, testing, and disseminating new ideas and techniques, but academic medicine is terribly threatened by the corporatization and federalization of American health care.

9.  The highest step in the academic ladder is the rank of Professor and this title was granted by the University to Cheryl Lee and Julian Wan. You may recall the details of some of their careers and recent accomplishments from the “What’s New” pieces they wrote earlier this year. David Miller became an Associate Professor and you probably were amazed at his “What’s New” as well. With this step David enters the realm of the senior establishment in the medical school and accordingly will start to grow gray hair or lose it like this correspondent. Academic promotions have to be recommended and approved by each departmental promotion and appointment committee, then by one of the three Dean’s Advisory Committees (the faculty vote on memberships for these), then by the Medical School Executive Committee (also elected by faculty vote), then by the Provost, and finally by the Regents. We also had two research investigators promote to Assistant Research Scientist: Jinlu Dai and Yun (Sean) Zhang.

10.  The Nesbit logo. Our original logo, dating back to the founding of our alumni society, is striking and memorable in its red and black. I don’t believe it is incumbent upon us to stray drastically from the founders’ intent, but three problems exist with the traditional logo. First, the original needs a higher quality (more pixels) for electronic communications, so we enlisted the help of an excellent graphic designer (David Heskett). Second, no one could recognize the figure holding the matula. It looks like Thomas Moore, but that couldn’t have been the case (why not Nesbit’s profile, or that of his teacher, Cabot?). Third, While we like the black and red (which certainly stands out in the sea of maize and blue promotionals) how about adding at least a little blue and gold? Last month, the overwhelming preference of those who respond to our query as option C – as shown here. Your further thoughts are welcomed.

Exhibit A.

New_Logo copy

Exhibit B.

LogoB

Exhibit C.

LogoC

Exhibit D.

LogoD

11. Speaking of logos, the UM this week announced a change in its official logo, adding our name explicitly to the block M.

UM logo

12. We have made some changes to our leadership line up at Michigan Urology. Three superb associate chairs over the past 6 years have been responsible for most of our good decisions and successes, but some change is necessary for us as an organization. Stuart Wolf has been magnificent in managing the Surgical Services, but we clearly need equivalent oversight for our far-flung ambulatory activities. John Stoffel, currently Service Chief, is the natural choice for Associate Chair of Ambulatory Urology Services. Gary Faerber, having turned over the position as Program Director to Khaled Hafez, will expand his portfolio as Associate Chair for Education to cover medical student education, fellowships, CME, and global urology. Gary will oversee the integration of education into all facets of our mission. John Wei has done an amazing job in understanding the research budget and of course did me and our department great service as Acting Chair.  He will pick up responsibility for our communications, marketing, and networking activities. I don’t have a perfect name for this but it will be simply something like Director of Communications, Marketing, and Networking (CMN). This will involve What’s New, our evolving web pages, videos, Facebook, etc. This work is a huge part of what I have been doing recently, but covering it inadequately so you can’t imagine my gratitude to John. That will open up Associate Chair for Research, which will shift to Brent Hollenbeck. As the first of the next generation of Division Chiefs, David Miller will take over from Brent as head of Health Services Research.

13.  I have taken some time over the past few years to instill “What’s New” into the fabric of our department, something that I thought valuable and possible, but was contingent on the “buy-in” of our faculty, residents, staff, alumni, colleagues, and friends. For the most part I think it has been a successful experiment, although “What’s New” is always a work in progress that has changed somewhat over the past 6 years. With our new organizational line-up, John Wei takes over most of this as Director of Communications, Marketing, and Networks. While the weekly “What’s New” communication is mainly an internal departmental document, with more of a focus on daily operational issues, the first Friday of each month, such as today, is broadcast more widely to alumni, full staff, joint faculty, and friends of the department. I’ll retain the first monthly “What’s New” (WN) broadcast so John can have one Friday off a month.

14.  We have noticed four downsides of that first Friday WN. As its distribution has grown larger the enlarging email list has become cumbersome and finicky. Email-based reading that requires more than cursory attention is likely to be inconvenient for you at the moment you open it and big emails, like WN, clutter up accounts. Lastly, big emails don’t archive easily and this is especially true for this first of the month WN broadcast. Thus we’ve placed the  First Friday WN into a blog at MatulaThoughts.org where it will sit as an accessible repository, although we will continue the email version in parallel for a time.

15. IMG_0721

With all the changes in climate, world economy, and health care the good news is that we keep hatching great generations of minds to take on the challenges. Out of our graduating class this year of nearly 170 UM medical students four are going into urology, each at excellent programs.  Sarah Hecht will go to Portland, Nirmish Singla to Dallas, Adam Gadzinski to San Francisco, and John DeLancey to Northwestern in Chicago.  They are eligible to be members of the Nesbit Society having gotten their start here in Ann Arbor, according to our recent bylaws change and we hope to see them regularly at the AUA Nesbit Reception and at other times as they continue their careers in urology.

16. All training programs struggle trying to balance the daily crush of clinical demands and the didactic aspects of residency education.  The traditional journal club has seemed problematic from my days as a resident at UCLA, through my time at Walter Reed, and then here in Ann Arbor. The increasing scale and geographic spread of our clinical activities has further compounded the problem of getting a reliable critical mass of faculty and residents together regularly in one place to consider new ideas in the literature. This upcoming academic year we will try to put in place an electronic journal club and invite your ideas and participation as we organize this. As a head start, consider three short pieces from JAMA.

17.  Electronic journal club #one. The first is a breathtaking article in the “Piece of My Mind” series centered around that essential deliverable of Michigan Urology: Kind and excellent-patient centered care, thoroughly integrated with innovation and education at all levels. This article is a matter of back to basics, but very elegant basics. The case in point is one of prostate cancer. [One last teaching moment. HE Longmaid III. JAMA 309:1695, 2013]

18. Electronic journal club #two. The second article is an analysis of persuasion, something that is essential to the job of a physician, but can be done rightly or wrongly. The author produces a useful framework for clinicians. [D Shaw, B Elger. Evidence-based persuasion. JAMA 309:1689, 2013] The authors believe that “persuasion is an essential component of modern medical practice, and it may be impossible to respect patients’ autonomy without engaging in persuasion.” They describe 3 different types of persuasion; a.) removal of bias, b.) recommending options, and c.) creating new biases. They suggest that bias may or may not be “permissible” and it is context that determines appropriateness. Six criteria are offered to ascertain that context, and you can find these listed in this short article.

19. Electronic journal club #three. The next seems to be more genuinely bad news in the form of new regulatory schemes, even if well-intended, from our regulatory organizations. [The clinical learning environment. KB Weiss, JP Bagian, TJ Nasca. JAMA 309, 2013] The authors state: “The next step in the evolution of resident physician training is the Next Accreditation System (NAS) which is now being implemented by the ACGME …  The Clinical Learning Environment Review (CLER) program is the first component of the NAS to be operationalized nationally.” This will require cycles of CLER visits to each program every 18 months. While regulation is obviously necessary in a free society, over-regulation creates a burden of administration and administrative expense that stifles autonomy, hinders the real daily work in the workplace, and wastes resources creating reports and rehearsals for the theater of those regulatory visits.

20. All local problems do not require national regulatory solutions. The Joint Commission (TJC) is another example where a well-intentioned regulatory organization becomes terroristic. Few can deny the terror imposed by the disruptive announced and unannounced inspections that cost many millions of dollars yearly to our organization alone. A sidebar industry of consultants and mock-visits has sprung up to help fearful hospitals prepare for TJC (formerly known as the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, or JCAHO) accreditation cycles. In an organization with millions of simple and complex patient transactions it is easy to find mistakes and areas for improvement. Of course we need public scrutiny and wise oversight, but failing to find gross systemic glitches or blatant dangers in the workplace, most inspections seem intent on finding nit-picking criticisms. The burden of structures and oversights on health care education and health care itself is truly excessive, and the idea proposed by Weiss, Bagian, and Nasca seems to me to be more of the same. Almost all organizations follow a Darwinian path to justify their existence and claim a stronger niche, so they explore or create needs in the environment. Unchecked, however, they will strangle the workplace and bring the real work of the gemba to a snail’s pace. That may be fine for a snail, but it’s not so great for the human potential.

21. amoebaAugust Johnann Rösel von Rosenhof (1705-1759) was a German naturalist and miniature painter who is believed to have first discovered the microscopic amoeba in 1757 although it was Jean Baptiste Bory de Saint-Vincent (1778-1846) a French naturalist who came up with the name “amibe” from the Greek term for change “amoibe.”  Amoeba proteus has 290 billion base pairs, rather a large number compared to the human genome with 2.9 billion base pairs (one wonders if phylogenic ascent requires some genomic leanness). These single celled animals move by pseudopodia as they explore their environment and the “false foot” that encounters the most inviting micro-environment gets the “vote” of the endoplasm that follows it.

22. The amoeba presents a nice metaphor for the departmental electronic journal club. As faculty, residents, or other participants (Nesbit alumni and friends of the department) explore the micro-environments of various journals and books so as to report them back to us, our corporate intellectual endoplasm can follow and be enriched by the most inviting new concepts and ideas.

23.  The future is contingent on innumerable factors, many within our control and many way beyond. While prediction capability and warning systems are good and improving, we need to keep our ears open & our eyes looking out the window. Indeed all of our senses and pseudopodia must attend to the environment around.

24. Our local environment is of particular interest, and the proposed (but recently “shelved”) merger of the Henry Ford System (previously an academic partner with us at UM) and the Beaumont System is especially notable. We have great Nesbit alumni working in both organizations, and at Beaumont two have held major leadership positions. Ananias Diokno has been CMO & executive vice president since 2006 and just retired June 1. David Wood, left our facility a little over a year ago to serve as president of the Beaumont Physician Partners, and he is the new CMO of Beaumont Health System.

25. This is the 8th year for the Michigan Men’s Football Experience (MMFE) which is our main fundraiser for prostate cancer research. The MMFE began in 2006, as a way for a grateful patient to honor the doctor who performed his lifesaving surgery. The patient was U-M Athletic Director Dave Brandon, then CEO of Domino’s Pizza, Inc., and his doctor was James E. Montie, M.D., the founding chair of the U-M Department of Urology (before then we were a Section of Urology in the Department of Surgery). Brandon, a former Michigan football player coached by Bo Schembechler, conceived the idea. Coach Lloyd Carr turned it into reality with an off-season 48-hour window in the life of the Michigan football team for a contribution to prostate cancer research. In 2011, Coach Brady Hoke gave a resounding yes when asked if he would continue the tradition and host the Michigan Men’s Football Experience. The two day event began yesterday with the traditional pre-game football dinner at the stadium’s Jack Roth Club with participants and coaching staff including Brady Hoke and Gary Moeller. Dave Brandon, Jim Brandstetter, Dan Dierdorf, Ganesh Palapattu, and Robert Soderstrom were the speakers.

26. Urodynamics has a deep history here in Ann Arbor and we have been fortunate in having great urodynamic nurses, including Charlene Neer (seen here on left with Zar Fuller). Charlene’s first job as an RN at UM was in the old hospital from 1977 to 1982, the last years of the Lapides regime.  Her most recent “go round” as an RN at UM for 20 years is just concluding with her retirement. She has been a steady and wonderful part of our department. (Electronic journal club #4: A history of the CMG J. Urol 160:316, 1998)Charlene

27.  Graduating Chief Residents:  Jon Ellison will be doing a Laparoscopic/Endourology Fellowship at Bristol in the United Kingdom and plans a pediatric urology fellowship the following year.  George Schade is going to the University of Washington in Seattle for an Oncology Fellowship.  Ray Tan will join the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program / Oncology Fellowship at the University of California Los Angeles.  Gareth Warren will complete a Genitourinary Reconstructive Fellowship at the University of Iowa. Fellows: Rob Jackson was with us the first 6 months for a fellowship in sexual reproductive urology with Dana Ohl and then joined Mountain States Urology in Boise, Idaho this year.  Chris Filson is completing his NIDDK T32 Clinical and Translational Research Training in Urology in Health Services Research and will be going to UCLA to complete an Oncology Fellowship alongside Ray Tan.  Bruce Jacobs completes an Oncology and Endourology Fellowship and will be joining the University of Pittsburgh faculty. Tomorrow evening is our graduation dinner for this fine group.

28. Coming on board with us when our chiefs leave are PGY1 Residents: Indraneel Gowdar from Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Amy Luckenbaugh from State University of New York at Buffalo, James Tracey from the Medical College of Wisconsin, and Yooni Yi from the University of Florida College of Medicine.  Fellows:  Nina Casanova will stay with us for a two-year Pediatric Urology Fellowship.  Paul Womble, a current Naval officer completed his urology residency from the University of Kansas Medical Center will join us for a two-year Oncology Fellowship.  Lindsey Menchen is joining us after completing a Urology Residency from the University of Pennsylvania for a Neurourology and Pelvic Reconstruction Fellowship.  AbdulRahman AlRuwaily is coming from Saudi Arabia for an Endourology Fellowship.

29.  Last month our internal weekly “What’s New” profiled Daniela Wittmann our Social Worker, Vesna Ivancic in the Pediatric Urology Division, and an update on the Urologic Oncology Division directed by Ganesh Palapattu. Website: http://www.med.umich.edu/urology/about/MonthlyNewsletter.html.

Upcoming events:

a.)      The inauguration of the Edward J. McGuire Research Professorship in Urology will be on Tuesday, June 25 at 4:30 PM at the BSRB Kahn Auditorium. Gary Faerber will be the first recipient of the McGuire Professorship. A reception will follow in the Omenn Atrium. We hope for robust departmental participation.

b.)      Thursday, July 18, Chang Lecture on Art & Medicine, 5:00-6:00 PM with reception following, Ford Auditorium, University of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI. Dr. Richard Prager, Professor of Cardiac Surgery and Head, Section of Adult Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, “Art as an Expression of the Human Condition.” Flyer attached.

c.)      Friday, July 19 Duckett/Lapides Lectureships, 9:00 AM-12:30 PM, MCHC Auditorium, Ann Arbor, MI. The visiting professors are Dr. Thomas Kolon, Associate Professor of Urology in Surgery from the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (Duckett) on “Cryptorchidism and Germ Cell Preservation” and Dr. Wayland Hsiao, Assistant Professor of Urology at Emory University School of Medicine (Lapides) on “After childhood fertility preservation, what are the state-of-the-art options.”  Flyer attached.

d.)      Thursday, October 17 and Friday, October 18, Reed Nesbit Urologic Society Meeting, North Campus Research Complex, Ann Arbor, MI. Saturday, October 19 U of M vs. Indiana in football, Michigan Stadium. Visiting Professor will be Dr. Raymond Costabile, Professor of Urology at University of Virginia Medical Center.

Best wishes, and thanks for spending time on “What’s New” this June weekend.

David A. Bloom, M.D.

The Jack Lapides Professor and Chair

Department of Urology

TEL: 734-232-4943

Email: dabloom@umich.edu

What’s New May, 2013

Michigan Urology Family

The Shannon number & retrograde thoughts

  1. May greetings from Michigan Urology. We are getting very close to fiscal year 2014 when many of the changes in health care due to the Affordable Care Act will be set into motion. Even without this act, American health care has been changing substantially due to the effects of the mandated electronic medical record, soaring costs, coalescing health care organizations, expensive new technology and drugs, escalating regulation and bureaucracy, as well as a new consumerism.  That last item, new consumerism, is the result of many influences of social media and 21st century human psychology expressed in direct-to-consumer advertising (for prescription drugs, specific bits of medical technology, individual heath care entities) as well as optimized web-based search engines. Little of this is good for the care of patients, the care of populations, the rational use of health care dollars, the profession of medicine, or health care education.
  2. At serious risk is the academic health care organization such as ours.  Our niche is precarious and there is little positive transformative change on the horizon. I expect some academic places will fail to negotiate that impending cliff, but I hope Michigan Urology will do as we have done in the past – that is to continue “to lead and be among the best.”  That will take transformative change from within our organization, emanating from our smart, creative, and engaged workforce of faculty, residents, health care providers, staff, researchers, alumni, and friends of the department. That change will also test the limits of our philanthropic base (good as it is) and our ability to generate a positive financial margin in the constrained fiscal years ahead.  But, I believe in the power of human imagination, especially in our department.
  3. Let me call your attention to the recent 97th anniversary of the birth of Claude Shannon (April 30, 1916 – February 24, 2001), the source of the concept of the Shannon number. Shannon, considered the father of information theory, was a Michigan Man. He was born in Petoskey in 1916, graduated from Gaylord High School in 1932, and got his B.S. in mathematics and electrical engineering from The University of Michigan in 1932. He traveled to MIT for a Ph.D. in mathematics in 1940 and then went to work at the famed Princeton Institute for Advanced Study. During WWII he worked at Bell Laboratories on matters of importance to the war effort, including cryptography. Shannon worked side by side with some of the best minds in 20th century science and had an enormous influence in creating the modern world of communications.
    Shannon
  4. A paper he wrote in 1950, “Programming a computer for playing chess”, is the source for the concept of the Shannon number. This represents the number of different possibilities in chess, that is the number of different possible games of chess. The number is said to be 10 to the 10 to the 50th power (1010 to the 50th).  I couldn’t put this into Microsoft PowerPoint as I can’t figure out how to do a double superscript. Anyway, it’s a huge number. Now, somewhere I’ve read that the number of atoms in the observable universe is 1087.  Whether these numbers are precisely true or not, they provide a great metaphor for the idea that human imagination (even just the tiny example of chess!) is far greater (numerically) than physical reality (particles in the universe).  Consider the thought that if chess offers such great possibility, what about language – and which language? What about basketball games? What about musical compositions? Human imagination is a whole different dimension beyond the three that we normally consider traveling through time and space. Human imagination is infinite.
  5. We had a faculty retreat late in April that centered around an analysis of our Urology Department’s clinical footprint.  Michigan Urology began and flourished in a public medical school that was created to teach the next generation of physicians for what was then, in 1850, a young state in a growing nation. Since then it has gotten more complex to produce that next generation of practitioners, going from a mere 2 years of classroom instruction in 1850, to 4 years of medical school that included laboratory investigations plus bedside instruction by 1890. Now 120 years later those 4 years of medical school are only a prelude to the residency and fellowship training that can add up to another 10 years of clinical and research experience to produce that finished product of “the next generation of medical professional.” Some medical schools, such as the University of Iowa that I just visited, have broadened their educational portfolio to include Physician Assistants (PAs) in the medical school cohort, resulting in a very high quality PA. At a place such as ours, it seems right to have such an ambitious educational portfolio, that is to want to produce the leaders and best of all important parts of the health care work force. We also must come to understand that in health care there is no such thing as a “finished educational product.” We and those we have trained must always be watching, learning, and changing. Of course, that’s hardly a new idea – people have been talking about the “practice of medicine” for hundreds of years.
  6. All this is to say that the point of my mini-sabbatical studies, the point of my “A3 analysis” with its sequelae that will unfold, and the point of the faculty retreat is that in this world of rapid change we need to understand the potential of the Shannon number and imagine a different future for the way we deliver, teach, and investigate health and health care. In concrete terms, the A3 analysis leads to the conclusion that we must understand, deconstruct, and reconstruct our clinical operations with a “value-stream” mentality. Everything we do (all of our clinical processes and “products” such as the patient’s call to the call center, the new patient visit, the diagnostic procedure, the inpatient experience, the clinical trials, patient educational materials, etc.) need to be inspected, recrafted for better value to the individual patient, recrafted for better value to the other customers, made leaner, and thoroughly integrated with innovation and education. This work will be best performed by those closest to each product and process. The possibilities are endless as Claude Shannon might have predicted. Although we are already late in the game in starting this, our first step is the engagement of the work force of Michigan urology and the belief in one unifying simple essential deliverable.
  7. Above all our analyses, mission statements, visions, goals, plans, and strategies I found from the discussions with faculty and staff, and from the A3 analysis, one single unifying idea. You might call this our essential deliverable. This is why we come to work each day, it is what the public expects first and foremost, and it is most likely a very central aspiration of most of us in the department whether clerk, MA, nurse, PA, NP, administrative assistant, physician, resident, fellow, statistician, or researcher. I believe the essential deliverable of the University of Michigan Department of Urology and its faculty and staff individually is KIND AND EXCELLENT PATIENT-CENTERED CARE THOROUGHLY INTEGRATED WITH INNOVATION AND EDUCATION AT ALL LEVELS.  If we get this right, everything else will follow.
  8. Two books I read on my mini-sabbatical caught my attention. “Intuition in Medicine” is a rather dense read and it sent me back to the dictionary many times. The author, an MD and Ph.D. named Hillel Braude gets into the mechanisms of reasoning, namely induction, deduction, and a process he calls abduction. The other book, called “Justice for Hedgehogs” (by Ronald Dworkin) intrigued me because I’ve long liked the idea that people tend to be either foxes or hedgehogs in terms of their reasoning as to how the world works. The idea was popularized by the great thinker Isaiah Berlin, who attributes it to a thinker from ancient Greece.
  9. Braude’s book had one great take-away concept for me, although that may not have been his central intention with the book. He introduced the idea of statistical physiognomy. Physiognomy is the archaic idea of looking at a person’s face and discerning their character. It is roughly analogous to phrenology whereby a physician could feel the shape of someone’s skull to diagnosis their illness. According to Braude statistical physiognomy is the implication that numeric data can be a surrogate for the actual patient. This is even worse than the classic metaphor of mistaking an actual patient for the disease.  The idea to me is that physicians first and foremost should look at, see, and talk to the patient. This was the concept that Michael Foucault called the “clinical gaze.” We should not confuse the patient for his or her disease. We cannot mistake a patient for a lab test. And today most especially we must not let ourselves substitute the computer screen and electronic medical record with the human being under our care.
  10. The author of “Justice for Hedgehogs”, Ronald Dworkin, was Professor of Law and Philosophy at NYU, but died just this past February. This is an amazing piece of work that focuses, as a hedgehog must, on one big thing. That big thing is something that concerns us centrally as physicians, but even more so it concerns us as generic human beings. The thing is simply and hugely “value.” The value that we seek in life encompasses truth, meaning, morality, justice, goodness, and freedom, to name some essential attributes. Morals are principles or habits that relate to right or wrong conduct that should be consistent. EO Wilson writes of the “biology of morality,” expressing the idea that these principles are built into us.  Whether built into us by means of evolutionary natural selection or breathed in at the time of Creation, is a metaphysical matter.  Physicians are assumed to have a strong moral sense, although we see it expressed in some degree of spectrum. Ethics are specific rules of conduct, that are defined according to some consensus and may differ for different groups. Thus the Hippocratic Oath outlines a set of 8 ethical rules for physicians. Maritime captains will share a somewhat different code of ethics.
  11. Dworkin, a legal scholar at heart, takes a very broad view of justice and links it fundamentally to something to which we all aspire – living a good and meaningful life. This is surely served well by that essential deliverable we discussed earlier. A phrase toward the end of Justice for Hedgehogs ties it all together well.
  12. Dworkin’s phrase. “But remember finally the truth as well as its corruption. The justice we have imagined begins in what seems an unchallengeable proposition: that government must treat those under its dominion with equal concern & respect. That justice does not threaten it expands – our liberty. It does not trade freedom for equality or the other way around. It does not cripple enterprise for the sake of cheats. It favors neither big nor small government but only just government. It is drawn from dignity & aims at dignity.  It makes it easier & more likely for each of us to live a good life well. Remember too that the stakes are more than mortal. Without dignity our lives are only blinks of duration. But if we manage to live a good life well, we create something more. We write a subscript to our mortality. We make our lives tiny diamonds in the cosmic sands.”
  13. The months fly by.  The current academic season is winding down as our chief residents prepare for their next steps and our incoming PGY1s prepare for “internship.”  Residents and fellows are the reason we exist as a department of urology – specifically, we are here to create the next generation of leaders in urology.  The context, milieu, or substrate for that education, however, is clinical care – which becomes the moral trump card for everything else on our plates at any moment. The best education requires the best clinical care – clinical care that is innovative if not at the cutting edge, clinical care that is safe, clinical care that is efficient, clinical care that is patient-centered, and clinical care that is kind.
  14. When the resident applicants come by in the late autumn for their interviews, I have been giving them a little slide talk about urology and the history of our department. The other day I was thinking about our “expectations” for residents and thought I’d add those thoughts to the slide show. What do I look for, and try to predict from their applications and interviews? It really came down to 5 things: character, drive, intellect, sociability, and productivity. As I made the slide it occurred to me that we expect no less of ourselves as faculty and clinical providers, research staff, and administrative staff.
  15. Our future as a department will largely depend on the intellectual and clinical productivity of our faculty in addition to the industry and success of our residents. I’ve been thinking about this a lot. My job is to optimize these things in an environment that is neither predictable nor even conducive to our work and ambitions. As a department, as a Faculty Group Practice, as a medical school and as a health system we try to learn from the best practices of our peers, from the academic community and from the business world. Amidst the cacophony of catch phrases of the day, we find some enduring concepts of value such as continuous quality improvement, lean process thinking, Gemba walks, SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats), and elimination of waste.
  16. David Spahlinger at our FGP retreat showed a TED Talk by Simon Sinek, and Fritz Seyferth at our 2012 urology retreat showed an excerpt from the film “Emperors’ Club.” These clips inspired me as they pulled my focus from the immediate and pressing issues of the moment to the submerged considerations of meaning and deep value in life. Modern daily life, especially in an academic health center, is complex and intense. But at the end of the day how do we integrate these central three things that ultimately matter most: a.) finding meaning in our lives, b.) supporting ourselves and families (– for most of us this means getting a paycheck), and c.) enjoying the day while planning for the future?
  17. Some of our best faculty have been asking the big “whys” of their careers and moved to other opportunities that we couldn’t match.  Ken Pienta is our most recent loss. While his primary appointment was in the Department of Internal Medicine, he had a joint appointment in the Department of Urology and in many ways was the intellectual epicenter of our uro-oncology research for more than 15 years. He has joined Johns Hopkins, which has enjoyed intellectual enrichment from its start – after all of its first 8 faculty in its medical school in 1893, 4 came from the University of Michigan. So Ken continues that great tradition of keeping that fine medical school in the game!
  18. From Ken. ”I am currently the Donald S. Coffey Professor of Urology and Professor of Oncology and Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences.  I serve as the Director of Research for the Brady Urological Institute at Johns Hopkins University.  My laboratory will continue to be involved in research to develop new therapies for prostate cancer through defining the tumor life-cycle utilizing ecological principles. We will especially be emphasizing the study of disseminated tumor cells as an invasive species to bone, and why they become dormant as well as start to proliferate in some patients.”
    Ken Pienta
  19. Ken’s new position is attached to the name of his beloved mentor, the inestimable Don Coffey who directed the urology research laboratories at Johns Hopkins. Don was a visitor here to Ann Arbor on a number of occasions and I especially recall one cold evening after a lecture and dinner when he and I drove to Borders Bookstore so I could get him a copy of E.O. Wilson’s mind-bending book “Consilience.” Both Wilson and Coffey have bent my mind most wonderfully. After conversations with them my head sometimes has felt a little soggy, as if edematous after over use, just as my inner ear feels after too much loud noise (Dads’ weekends at Indiana University with the Delta Gamma daughters visiting fraternity parties – my advice to the next generation of dads: carry ear plugs.)
    Picture 1
  20. I love this quote from Northrup Frye: “the human word is the power that orders our chaos.”  Words are more than just the tools of our communication, they shape our thought. One of my favorite words, retrograde, links astronomy and urology. Retrograde is a word of distinguished provenance having early been used, if not invented, by William Shakespeare who used it first in Hamlet (1599-1602) when Claudius tries to dissuade his nephew (and step-son) the prince from returning to school in Wittenberg, saying of that intent: ”It is most retrograde to our desire  –And we beseech you, bend you to remain –Here in the cheer and comfort of our eye…”  Later, in All’s Well that Ends Well (1604-1605), Helena says “When he was retrograde, I think, rather.”  Although a less memorable quote, Helena’s comment still gives a full sense of the term.
  21. Astronomy as a field also uses the term, most usually in relation to orbiting planets and their moons. Thus eight planets in our solar system orbit the sun in one direction called “prograde” (counterclockwise as viewed from the pole star, Polaris), while Venus and Uranus have retrograde orbits. Medicine did not embrace the term “retrograde” until after 1906 when Voelcker and von Lichtenburg described a happy marriage between Mr. Roentgen’s pictures and urology as they passed a cystoscope into the bladder, catheterized a ureter, and injected a contrast agent so as to “shoot” a retrograde pyelogram and visualize the upper urinary tract. When, exactly, “retrograde” was actually applied to this technique is a matter of further study for me.
  22. I bring this matter of words up, because of the use of the word “terror” recently, particularly in relation to the Boston Marathon tragedy of April 15.  Geopolitics and terrorist activities have brought the idea to the public that this tragedy was “an act of terror.” That term was first out of the gate in news reports and it may be coupled with this event throughout our attempts to bring the perpetrators to justice and thereafter in the historical accounts. The use of the terrorism card did allow full weight of federal resources (the FBI and federal attorney jurisdiction) to come into play, resources that undoubtedly are necessary to deal effectively with any crime on such a large scale.  In reality, though, the disruption of the marathon was fundamentally a matter of mass assault, battery, and murder. No political excuse can be accepted. No excuse of mental illness can be accepted. No excuse of cultural alienation can be accepted. These were petty hooligans who resented the good fortune and happiness of other people. Bomb-building allowed these small-time closet thugs to achieve 15 minutes of notoriety in the news media of the day, at outrageous cost to hundreds of people they never knew. This behavior is not compatible with civilized people, it is not compatible with civilization. It is retrograde.
  23. Health care is in the midst of a storm of epic proportion, although perhaps this will come to be viewed as a period of creative destruction. The meteoric effects of the federally mandated electronic health record may prove to benefit the greater good of mankind someday, although they mainly now seem to be benefiting the specific good of a few companies whose products (literally) fit the legislated bill of “meaningful use.”  I’ll leave retrograde thoughts to your imagination here.
  24. Most destruction is not creative. Now that we are in tornado season it’s wise to keep an eye out the window or on the media for bad winds and tipping points. On this day in 1999 a portion of Oklahoma City was devastated by an F5 tornado, killing forty-five people, injuring 665, and causing $1 billion in damage. The tornado produced the highest wind speed ever recorded, measured at 301 +/- 20 mph (484 +/- 32 km/h) and was one of 66 in the 1999 Oklahoma tornado outbreak that included the picture shown below on the same day near Anadarko. Storms of epic proportions are freak anomalies of the atmosphere, just like the retrograde anomalies of human behavior that created the tragedy we saw in Boston last month. As we study these anomalies imaginatively and robustly, we should come to understand them and predict them better in the future.
    images
  25. Facebook & Blog. A reminder that we now have a Facebook page, called (as you might have guessed) Matula Thoughts. We will try to post something relevant to Michigan Urology several times a week and would be grateful for any observations or pictures that you (Nesbit alumni, friends of the department, staff, health care providers, researchers, residents, faculty, or colleagues) would be kind enough to send me for inclusion. This blog will be the site for the global “What’s New” we send out at the beginning of each month, usually around the first Friday. Of course, comments regarding these present Matula Thoughts, will be gratefully received.

Best wishes, and thanks for spending time on “What’s New” this weekend. I hope to see many of our friends & alumni on Sunday at the Nesbit Reception in San Diego and will give you an update on that next month.

David Bloom,  Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor